Roivant Sciences Reports 2026 Annual General Meeting Voting Results

Executive Summary

On September 18, 2026, Roivant Sciences Ltd. (NASDAQ: ROIV) filed a Form 8-K detailing the results of its 2026 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on September 16, 2026.

A total of 652,143,869 common shares were represented in person or by proxy, representing approximately 90.3% of the 722,406,273 common shares entitled to vote, thereby constituting a quorum. All three management proposals presented to shareholders were approved.

---

Voting Results Summary

Proposal 1: Election of Class II Directors

Shareholders voted to re-elect two Class II directors to serve until the annual general meeting following the fiscal year ending March 31, 2029:

• Daniel Gold:

  • For: 375,791,264
  • Withheld: 210,203,958
  • Broker Non-Votes: 66,148,647

• Meghan FitzGerald:

  • For: 422,428,908
  • Withheld: 163,566,314
  • Broker Non-Votes: 66,148,647

Proposal 2: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm and statutory auditor for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2027:

• For: 651,315,490
• Against: 731,364
• Abstain: 97,015
• Broker Non-Votes: 0

Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay)

Shareholders approved, on an advisory non-binding basis, the compensation of named executive officers:

• For: 316,702,500
• Against: 269,062,122
• Abstain: 230,600
• Broker Non-Votes: 66,148,647

Note: While approved, the Say-on-Pay proposal experienced a notable level of opposition, passing with approximately 54.1% of votes cast in favor (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes).

---

Market & Governance Impact

• Trading Significance: Low. The outcomes represent routine annual corporate governance actions without material surprises to operations or corporate capital structure.
• Notable Governance Observation: The relatively narrow margin on Proposal 3 (Say-on-Pay) and sizeable withheld votes on Class II directors indicate elevated shareholder scrutiny regarding executive compensation programs.